home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ccnet.com!not-for-mail
- From: felinoid@ccnet.com (Jeffery C McLean)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.comp.virus,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.unixware.misc
- Subject: Re: Will anyone buy NT?? (Re: I will NEVER buy Windows 95 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-( Who really gives a shit what you buy
- Followup-To: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.comp.virus,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.unixware.misc
- Date: 15 Jan 1996 18:57:47 -0800
- Organization: CCnet Communications (510-988-7140 guest)
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4df47b$h1k@ccnet3.ccnet.com>
- References: <1d7cc$16392e.2b6@news.inf.net> <30f8988b.9954388@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <30f8c93c.918044@news.sasknet.sk.ca> <4dap0r$oe5@news.netvoyage.net> <slrn4fi89a.a4p.davis@wiwaxia.mit.edu> <DL6oMn.4LA@world.std.com> <4dbk1c$cpn@hermes.oc.com> <30F9552C.69B5@panix.com> <4dci38$99e@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> <30fa5ce3.4518002@news2.microserve.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ccnet3
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Ellis M. Zsoldos Jr. (ezsoldos@microserve.com) wrote:
- : abmyles@unity.ncsu.edu (Albert Bruce Myles) wrote:
-
- : >Isn't Windows NT Microsoft's continuation of their development of OS/2
- : Acutally, Windows NT was originally supposed to be called OS/2 3.0.
- : Microsoft pulled the OS/2 PM API's during their falling out with IBM
- : (& Akers at the time). The Console Mode OS/2 API's are still in place
- : in NT to this day.
-
- Anyone know why Microsoft and IBM fell out?
- Anyone want to retell the storys of why IBM used Dos insted
- of CP/M86 (as was origanly planned)
- --
- felinoid@ccnet.com
- http://www.ccnet.com/~felinoid/
-